Home » 10: Philip as Missionary – Discussion Starters    

Comments

10: Philip as Missionary – Discussion Starters — 2 Comments

  1. I anticipate my Sabbath School class asking why did Philip being filled with the Holy Ghost (as a deacon) baptize the Samaritans in Jesus name only so that it had to take Peter and John to come from Jerusalem to "lay hands" on them so that they could receive the Holy Ghost..Was he refusing to baptize in the Father,Son and Holy Ghost?

    Also does the receipt of the Holy Ghost immediately after the "laying of hands" suggest that something visible was observed (other than those occasions when they spoke in tongues)? Simon must have seen some immediate change in these converts for him to want to buy such powers?
    May I have comments please.

    (3)
  2. An answer to the question as to why the apostles from Jerusalem had to come in order to lay their hands on the newly converted Samaritans so that they would receive the Holy Spirit, could be given from a historical perspective of the early church.

    Three churches could have emerged: A Jewish-Christian Church with the center at Jerusalem, a Gentile-Christian Church with the center at Antioch und a Samaritan-Christian Church with the center at Samaria. The Jerusalem Council was averting the split into a Jewish-Christian Church and a Genitle-Christian Church. The Holy Spirit was guiding that council on the way of unity (Acts 15:28). The Pauline epistles affirm that these two groups are united in one church (Galatisns 3:27-28; Ephesians 2:14-15).

    Even before that time, the Holy Spirit was operative in uniting the Jewish-Christian Church and the Samaritan Christian Church by coming down after the apostles from Jerusalem had laid their hands on the newly converted samaritan believers. The Holy Spirit was working in the development of the early Christian Church aiming at unity according to the intercessional prayer of Christ (John 17:21). The Holy Spirit has left a footprint in early history indicating that the He will fall on a united church -- not split into many fractions.

    As to the baptism in the name of Jesus (Acts 8:12): Inasmuch as the baptismal formula even before the time of Acts (Matthew 28:19) is a trinitarian formula (there is one name and three persons united in that name) --- baptism in the name of Jeus includes the Father and the Son, inasmuch as it is impossible that Jesus could be separated from the Father and the Holy Spirit.

    It is also to be mentioned that the Holy Spirit has inspired both baptismal formulas (Matthew 28:19 and Acts 8:12). Hence, it is impossible that the Holy Spirit is contradicting, fighting and splitting Himself and the Trinity. A denial of this operatinal unity of the Holy Spirit will also split the church and hinder the outpouring of the Holy Spirit (see Matthew 12:25).

    Prayer for the outpouring of the Holy Spirit includes prayer for unity on the basis of scripture.

    Winfried Stolpmann

    (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>