HomeDailyFriday: Further Thought – Tried and Crucified    

Comments

Friday: Further Thought – Tried and Crucified — 1 Comment

  1. The theology of Christ's substitutionary death has become the subject of some fairly intense debate both within the Seventh-day Adventist Church and in the wider Christian community. I did some research on the topic using search engines and mostly I got responses that concluded with the observation that there are many nuances to this discussion and no clear answers. Part of the problem is that folk who take up this argument often form their own definitions and vigorously defend their ideas based on those definitions.

    Here are some observations about Seventh-day Adventists that I have picked up from my research (Note these are not my ideas; I am simply asking you to think about them):

    • Seventh-day Adventists acknowledge the substitutionary nature of Christ's death but also emphasise a broader understanding of his atonement.
    • Seventh-day Adventists see Christ's life and death as a perfect example of obedience.
    • They believe that Christ's life is essential for our sactification.
    • They believe that Christ's death is propitiation for God's wrath, appeasing his anger towards sin.
    • Christ's victory over sin through his death provides us with the power to overcome temptation and sin.

    I am not sure that we would agree with these all perceptions. Nor do I believe that it is essential to our salvation to understand all the nuances that are represented here.

    I like Ellen White's simple summary:

    "The atoning sacrifice of Christ was the greatest manifestation of God's love ever given to the world." (Steps to Christ, p. 18)

    If we accept God's love and live within that love, then the argument is won.

    For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

    (3)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>