HomeDailyTuesday: Dispossession or Annihilation?    

Comments

Tuesday: Dispossession or Annihilation? — 2 Comments

  1. As we explore today's study, "Dispossession or Annihilation?", let's remember that the topic is a question. This is closely tied to the theme of the week "God Fights for You". How could the answer to this question impact our lives today? God repeatedly assured Moses and Joshua that He would fight for Israel, and all Israel needed to do was trust and stand back (Exodus 14:14, Deuteronomy 1:30, Joshua 10:14). Indeed, we see God fighting for Israel (without Israel lifting a finger) against the army of Sennacherib, king of Assyria (2 Kings 19:35-37).

    A puzzling aspect is why God involved Israel in the conquest of Canaan when He could have done it alone. The answer lies in God's desire for Israel to learn and understand the significance of His commandments and the consequences of disobedience (Deuteronomy 8:1-20). Israel's involvement would teach them about God's justice, mercy, and the dangers of self-exaltation and idolatry (Deuteronomy 18:9-14). The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah serves as a stark reminder of God's judgment against wickedness and corruption (Genesis 18-19). Similarly, Canaan's corruption and wickedness led to their downfall. Israel's role was to witness God's judgment and learn to walk in His ways (Deuteronomy 12:1-4), revering, serving, and obeying God (Deuteronomy 13:4).

    As we reflect on this, let's examine our own lives. Do we unwittingly worship other things – our education, jobs, wealth, relationships, or material possessions? (Matthew 6:24, 1 Timothy 6:10). The lesson from Canaan's desolation and Israel's occupation is clear: for God to reign in our hearts, we must destroy our selfishness and focus all praise as well as worship on Him (Matthew 16:24-25, Luke 9:23-24).

    (1)
  2. I am a big fan of maps. I love to learn about the location of historical places because it gives an insight into the events that took place there. So, as a little aside this morning and a bit of a break from the morality of conquering the land and its people, here is a little bit about Jericho to provide a perspective for us. (We have the rest of the week for the heavy stuff!)

    Ancient Jericho was not very big. Archeological evidence shows that it was about 6 to 9 acres in size. We had paddocks (fields) that big for the fifty-odd cows on our dairy farm. That means the perimeter was most likely less than a kilometre. The population cannot be determined with any accuracy, but estimates vary from several hundred to a maximum of between two and three thousand.

    The archaeological remains are in a mound called Tell es-Sultan. It is quite close to the Dead Sea (less than 15km) and the Jordan River, We should not overlook the fact that it is 275m below sea-level. Like most ancient cities, it has been built and destroyed several times with each rebuilding above but using previous layers of civilisations. Readers should be aware that the site has been the subject of several archaeological investigations, many of them setting out to prove the Biblical account. Some of these reports are unreliable. There is a fair degree of agreement that there was a major attack at some stage in the likely period of the Exodus, and the city was burned in the process. Among that evidence is some charred grain in storage, which suggests that the attack was quick and not the result of a drawn-out siege. If the city had been under siege for any length of time, there would have been no stored grain.

    (0)

Leave a Reply

Please read our Comment Guide Lines and note that we have a full-name policy. Please do not submit AI-generated comments!

Notify me of follow-up comments via e-mail. (You may subscribe without commenting.)

Please make sure you have provided a full name in the "Name" field and a working email address we can use to contact you, if necessary. (Your email address will not be published.)

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>