Further Study: “The success attending the preaching of the gospel aroused the anger of the Jews anew. From every quarter were coming accounts of the spread of the new doctrine by which Jews were released from the observance of the rites of the ceremonial law and Gentiles were admitted to equal privileges with the Jews as children of Abraham. . . .
Image © Stan Myers from GoodSalt.com
His [Paul’s] emphatic statement, ‘There is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision’ (Colossians 3:11), was regarded by his enemies as daring blasphemy, and they determined that his voice should be silenced.”—Ellen G. White, The Acts of the Apostles, p. 390.
“And he could not count upon the sympathy and support of even his own brethren in the faith. The unconverted Jews who had followed so closely upon his track, had not been slow to circulate the most unfavorable reports at Jerusalem, both personally and by letter, concerning him and his work; and some, even of the apostles and elders, had received these reports as truth, making no attempt to contradict them, and manifesting no desire to harmonize with him.”—Page 398.
Discussion Questions:
- The twelve disciples Paul met in Ephesus were former followers of John the Baptist who had already become disciples of Jesus (Acts 19:1-7). Why do you think that it is correct to use this passage to require rebaptism of Christians—already baptized by immersion—from other denominations who join the Adventist faith? Is there any significance in the fact that Apollos was not rebaptized?
- Think about Paul’s situation. He is rejected by his own countrymen who don’t believe in Jesus. Even of the Jews who do believe in Jesus, many view Paul with great suspicion, even distrust, because they think he is perverting the “landmarks.” Many of the pagans hate the gospel he is proclaiming. And yet—what? Why did Paul press on, despite all this opposition? Though we are not Paul, what can we take away for ourselves from his story?
- Think about some of the other arguments that people use to try to prove either that the Sabbath was changed to Sunday or that it is no longer binding. How do we answer those arguments and do it in a way to show that obedience to the Sabbath is no more legalism than is obedience to any of the other nine commandments; that is, if we obey by faith and with understanding of where our only hope of salvation lies?
|
I have loved this page its very educative to me.
Iam a ghanain but live in lesotho.
Keep this work up...
My family loves double stay blessed
The truth is the truth and there is no other. But everyone lives a different reality, phisically, mentally, spiritually, socially. And these influence the way one thinks, understands and reacts. That is a fact. Two or more people may even be reading the same thing, in the same language, but the meaning of what is being said is not always perceived as it was originally communicated! We all place our experiences into what we receive, and of course into what we give. Besides being something logical and of rational choice, isn´t it possible that all of our understanding of the truth may be influenced by who we are? First of all, in order to receive more light we need to be looking and open for it. Like empty vases waiting to be filled with water, we may be limited in holding concepts and knowledge. Do we need to undress ourselves before God everyday in order to be covered by Him with new clothes? Or we just add things on top of each other and stop being able to move freely?
I need to pray for a new mind and a new heart, and I also believe that I have to do this everyday. But I know I am limited, my experiences hold me back, my memories, my marks. Thank God that He can get everything I have and rearrange! Thank God that He is able to make me new! This is the perfect miracle!
1. As for rebaptism being required, won't that be up to the conviction of the one being accepted into the new understanding they now have received? I've seen some convicted of the need while others were not. The Holy Spirit will lead all who seek the will of God with all their heart.
2. How to answer this 2nd question? What about Jer 17:5? “Cursed be the man that trusts in man, and makes flesh his arm, who's heart departs from the Lord.” Paul did not rely on the approval of anyone but his Savior and Lord. Jesus taught that the way that leads to life(Truth) will be found by only a few. So it matters not the profession of the man, but his obedience to the Truth. So if you follow truth at each step, any who don't will be your enemies, even if they are a pastor or conference president, or even of your own family. Paul's enemies did not understand the truth, and thus believed he was undermining their idea of “truth”. What would Jesus say? “What is that to you? You follow ME”.
3. What is there to argue about the Sabbath? Just share the very words of the Lord from Sinai and the words of the Lord from the mount of blessing. If they don't believe in Jesus, they won't believe you no matter your many sound arguments, as Daniel wrote: “none of the wicked will understand”. All the best “arguments” over the Sabbath issue will not stop the coming persecution against all who honor the day of God's commandment. Our duty is to teach the Gospel in the light of God's Law, and all who accept Christ will accept His day of Rest.
God use Paul mightily.He also use us mightily. Truth is the greatest power the earth has. Christ is the truth. Let us continue to give our hearts, so Christ can fill us with His truth.
We have to follow God through good and evil times Psalms 23. His grace will make us will if we give Him our hearts so He can will in us to do according to His good pleasure. Phil. 2:13.
Peace and Love from Jamaica