HomeDailyMonday: By Faith Abraham    

Comments

Monday: By Faith Abraham — 10 Comments

  1. The story of Abrahan and Sarah is not a fairy-tale "Once upon a time..." "...and they lived happily ever after" story. The Bible records not only the faith-affirming events but also the times when they tried to do things their own way. How many times did Abraham try to pass off Sarah as his sister? Who developed the home-grown contingency inheritance insurance plan?

    The big picture story though is one of growing faith and trust. Abraham learned from his mistakes and as a consequence, his faith grew. When God tested that faith towards the end of his life, Abraham's trust was implicit.

    Faith is not a theoretical concept. It grows through experience and exercise.

    Remember the failed weightlifter!

    (48)
    • Maurice - Yes, I remember your weightlifter who never actually became a true 'weightlifter'! The person continuously thought about becoming one but got stuck at learning everything he could find about the 'weightlifting'.
      No matter how much he learned about weightlifting, it was never enough to convict him to actually involve himself in the activity, finding out for himself what a 'weightlifter' actually is or experiences.
      (replace 'weightlifter' with 'believer', and the learning about 'weightlifting' with always studying and never coming to actually live the Truth by faith- 2Tim.3:4-7 )

      (28)
  2. "Hebrews concludes that Abraham amazingly solved the conundrum by arriving at the conclusion that God would resurrect Isaac after he had offered him."
    - - - - - - -
    Many OT passages offer lacunae--gaps in the text that later writers can fill in with speculations or explanations. Genesis is full of them, from the first to last chapter. These "explanations" were collected by Jewish scholars in Midrash, Targums (notes accompanying translations) and later Gemara (medieval commentary).

    This text is an example of early Christian midrash. There is nothing in the text of Genesis which supports it, yet for any reader with Christian assumptions, it makes sense. Christianity made great headway in the Jewish cultures of the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD by offering similar "explanations" of biblical conundra. These in turn shaped Christian theology into what it is.

    The question that must be asked: is there any other way to understand the story in Genesis?

    (4)
    • Jordan River,

      How do I interpret what you said versus 2 Peter 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

      It sounds like to me that you are discounting the authenticity of the bible.

      (10)
      • Agreed. The New Testament is inspired commentary of the Old Testament. I can think of many examples of the NT expanding on the OT saying more than what is in the original OT. Any “midrash” that made it into the NT must have God’s approval and should be considered truth.

        (7)
    • Jordan, you may not see this message, but there IS another way to understand the story in Genesis, a way that does not make God look like He divinely changed His mind to make a point to Abraham. But a way that vindicates the character of God, who does NOT ask for child sacrifices, neither have it come into His mind.
      If you read this, please respond, that way I know I have your ears before giving an explanation. God Bless!!

      (3)
    • On the third day Abraham caught sight of the place in the distance. So he] said to his servants, “You two stay here with the donkey while the boy and I go up there. We will worship and then return to you.” (Genesis 22:4 NET.)

      So if Isaac was actually made a burnt offering, that is, the flesh completely consumed (incinerated) by fire, was Abraham delusional when he said, “We will worship and then return to you.”? I think not—no lacunae here. It looks to me as if Abraham believed that God would resurrect Isaac from the charred bones.

      Just a thought.

      (3)
    • The writer of Hebrews had this to say about Abraham:

      By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten son, Of whom it was said, That in Isaac shall thy seed be called: Accounting that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead; from whence also he received him in a figure. (Heb. 11:17-19)

      Thus, the writer explicitly says that Abraham believed that God was able to raise Isaac up from the dead to fulfill the promise previously given to Abraham.

      In view of what you wrote earlier, it is important to ask whether you regard the New Testament as mere "speculations" or "explanations"? If you do, there's not much of value those of us who believe that the Holy Spirit inspired the writers of the Bible can say to you.

      (1)
  3. Abraham said to Isaacc, God will provide. He had faith, which led to trust, that He most suredly would provide, even with a resurection. We learned yesterday's lesson that we can have that faith also. If we can't enter in because of unbelief, Hebrews 3:19. we truly can enter in because of belief. John 8:31-32.

    (5)
  4. Hebrews11:3 is the dividing line between the faithful, and the faithless. Our very existence, the existence of our planet, our only moon, solar system, Milky way galaxy, and the universe all exist and sustained by the Word, and will of God. This is our understanding, and knowledge that is obtained by faith.
    Those without faith, the faithless, are searching for something tangible, a "god particle" a physical substance that they can identify as the beginning of all matter in the universe. If we did not have the sacred scriptures, what would we left with? We would only have various origin theories based on mathematical calculations, experiments, all based upon the observable universe. In effect" Your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil". Genesis 3:5 NKJV. Or as William Earnest Henley wrote in his poem, Invictus,"I am the master of my fate, I am the captain of my soul".

    If Hebrews 11 we're then written as a faithless chapter, who would it include? Perhaps the likes of Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Herod the Great, Nero, all of the Popes, Napoleon, Stalin, Hitler, Mao Zedong, and lastly Putin, along with a description of their crimes against humanity.

    Our faith in the Word of God is our only hope. "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God" Luke 4:4 NKJV.

    (5)

Leave a Reply

Please read our Comment Guide Lines and note that we have a full-name policy.

Please make sure you have provided a full name in the "Name" field and a working email address we can use to contact you, if necessary. (Your email address will not be published.)

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>