HomeDailyThe Book of Revelation    

Comments

The Book of Revelation — 4 Comments

  1. “the historicist method of prophetic interpretation is the correct way to understand the prophecies’ intended fulfillment because they follow the flow of history, from the prophet’s time to the end of the world.”

    I believe that statement is exceedingly important as we begin the study of Revelation.

    The historicist method lays the foundation for understanding the book, yet it is hugely rejected by the majority of Christians in their study of Revelation.
    Not so long ago it WAS the principle method by which Protestants studied the books of Daniel and Revelation. It generated the Protestant movement, as well as the Adventist movement.

    Yet, now futurism seems to have taken the field and has even invaded into some Adventist circles.

    Yes, Revelation is the revelation of Jesus Christ, not just the final scenes of earth’s history, but is all about His work from the cross to the restoration.
    It reveals how the people of earth respond throughout that whole time, how the forces try to obliterate Christ and His work for us, from the minds of the people.
    It covers the scenes in heaven of Christ beginning His work in the “holy place” and shows how later He moves into the most Holy Place when “the time of judgment has come”, and it shows Christ coming again! There are no gaps.

  2. I really appreciate this site
    More specially the powerpoint presentation on the details and explanation of the lesson
    God bless you more

  3. Adventist HOPE is when we look back to the FINISHED WORK done on our behalf IN CHRIST. The book of Revelation predicted the attitudes of all humanity towards Christ and His Siamese Twin Message (The Commandments of God and The Faith of Jesus Christ/Everlasting Gospel )

Leave a Reply

Please read our Comment Guide Lines and note that we have a full-name policy. Please do not submit AI-generated comments!

Notify me of follow-up comments via e-mail. (You may subscribe without commenting.)

Please make sure you have provided a full name in the "Name" field and a working email address we can use to contact you, if necessary. (Your email address will not be published.)

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

At a camp meeting 40 years later, I happened to see Dr. I. demonstrating some kind of health product, if I remember correctly. (In my mind, I see only the image of him, much older, but still looking much like he did when I was a student, with a friend by my side.) I lingered a little but did not introduce myself. I briefly wondered whether he recognized me. I’m fairly sure that I was as recognizable to him as he was to me.

Had he changed? Or did he still feel superior in his “humility”? Should I talk to him? I didn’t know how to approach him, and was busy with friends. I still don’t know whether I should have said something. (Maybe I’m just a coward.)

If God wants him to see my story, his and my identity are clear enough in this post, that God can direct him to it.