HomeBeliefs About LivingBody Temple - Fundamental Belief 22Does Mark 7 Tell Us it is Okay to Eat Pork?    

Comments

Does Mark 7 Tell Us it is Okay to Eat Pork? — 11 Comments

  1. Although all food goes in the mouth and out the other end, and it is of no effect to the person but if we say we are Christian and therefore Christ like, we are to keep the same commandants as Christ did. For if Christ broke any of the commandments then he could not be are substitute for sins.

    (7)
  2. Thanks for the clear and elaborate explanation of this week's lesson about Mark 7:19 that you had presented.. Hope all of us will be guided and not confused accordingly, and instead, be able to discuss this with others convincingly.

    (7)
  3. There are two valuable points I get out of your discussion.
    1. Christ was speaking in parable. We learned the reason for parables last week.
    2. Some translations, infact many do use conjecture in printhises, thus leading people astray.
    I have a story but I will save it for my Sabbath School class.

    (0)
    • John, what is said in parentheses is exactly right and goes along with the KJV saying “purging all meats.” The problem is when people take it out of context. Again, if you wake up with your kids on a vacation day and tell them they can do anything they want that obviously has to be within context. You’re not telling them they can go rob a bank. Likewise Jesus did say that all food is clean, but it did not include pork because as far as Jesus was concerned, pork was not food. You have to keep things in context.

      (8)
  4. Thanks, I hear ya. I'll remember that as the correct usage of context, giving a better understanding of the parable.

    (0)
  5. Mark is writing to his gentile listeners explainig to them the ritual customs of the jews. (Mark 7:3-4) Matthew, using Mark as source of his gospel, might have stopped at Mark 7:19 supposing this text to offer a possibility of misunderstanding. So he clearly is pointing out that evil thoughts make people unclean, as their hearts are unclean. (Matthew 15:19) Leaving no reason for misunderstanding he says, but to eat with unwashed hands makes man not unclean. Matthew and Mark have the same context "ritual cleansing".

    Jews, coming from the market place, considered themselves as unclean being in need of ritual hand-washing. In order not to repeat the mistake of idol worship prior the the babylonian captivity, they were trying to establish a wall against any kind of uncleanliness, but going from one extreme to the other.

    Could it be that we may fall into the same pattern? The real point of issue is bringing out the Prophet Ezekiel poiting out the need getting of a new heart. (Ezekiel 36:26-27)

    Winfried Stolpmann

    (2)
  6. I'm Paul from Uganda;
    For me I will use Matthew 7:9-11 to answer the above question....
    Matthew 7:9-11 Or what man is there of you, whom if his son ask bread, will he give him a stone?....
    In Matthew, Jesus points at an unclean Animal ( the serpent ) as something bad a father whether righteous or evil cannot give to his children... So pork is a meat of an unclean Animal anyone of us can neither eat nor give to your children coz every unclean thing is a bad thing for us and our children..... The serpent is unclean and Jesus points at it as something not good for people for food .. and the pork as well is unclean so it's also bad for the people to eat...so every unclean thing is bad for us to eat..

    Happy Sabbath

    (2)
  7. I've often wondered why we adhere to Lev. 11 but not 12. Any pastor (admittedly few) I've asked couldn't answer that. With a closer read of 11, I see 2 things going on.
    1) Certain animals were not good to eat.
    2) Those same animals were unclean to the point where touching their carcass made one unclean (wash and remain unclean until evening.)
    Generally, we no longer practice ceremonial clean/unclean laws (tho' I have run into exceptions, eg women who observe Lev. 12).
    We do, however, emphasize a health message. Sadly, many of us may avoid eating the pig, but "pig out" on other food. And don't get me started on sugar!

    (2)
    • I'm no expert but I would suggest that the concepts of defilement are symbols of sin and Christ's sacrifice dealt with that defilement. It would no longer be in force. So we wouldn't be defiled if we picked up a dead pet to bury it (dogs and cats are unclean after all).

      However, the system of unclean and clean animals goes back to the flood. It doesn't actually stand or die on the Levitical laws, though they make clear which animals are unclean. It seems clear that God only intended certain animals to be eaten right from the start and clearly unclean animals weren't for food. If they'd been eaten after the flood, they would go extinct as there were only 2 at the beginning.

      (3)
  8. Those that use these verses to declare that Jesus just removed the distinction and prohibition of eating unclean things don't understand this concept called context. It's been said that a verse taken out of context is a pretext.

    Straining at gnats and swallowing camel burgers. Aren't they the same in concept? The religious leaders even today engage in much the same foolishness, in trying to twist verses out of their context to suit their own pretext. They wrest scriptures to their own destruction. The wise and diligent Bible student won't be fooled by such slight of hand.

    I was raised in a home where we were called to, "wash up, it's time to eat!". This wasn't for any kind of ritual observance though, it was basic sanitation, and propriety. If your hands and face were dirty you naturally "washed up" before coming to the table.

    Before we come to the "Table of the Lord", Communion, we should indeed, "wash up", spiritually. Not to be ceremonially clean, but because we are coming before the King.

    Don't let others do your thinking for you. Now more than ever we need to be honest "Bereans" and be sure what the preacher is preaching is in harmony with what the Word is teaching.

    (3)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>